Club Newsletter

 

INWC Newsletter

January 1807 (2007)

In This Issues:

Quiz Answers - Bernard Haulotte, II Reserve Cavalry, French

The New Adventures of Marbot - Clifton Seeney, IV Corps (Italians), French

Interview with Peter Hofschröer - From NWC Prussian Army (On Loan from Scott Ludwig, Prussian Webmaster at NWC)

Battle of Rivoli - Scott Ludwig, CiC, French

Best of the Forum

(NOTE: I am not sure if Andrea sent this, but I think he did.)

 

Answer to Quiz - Bernard Haulotte, II Reserve Cavalry, French

The answers: 1. Bruges

2 27ème Chasseurs

3 Pistolet

4 Espagne

5 Marchand de vin

6 Pigeonnier

7 Braves

8 Char d'assaut

9 T'Serclaes de Tilly

10 Parachutage

11 Liège

12 Carnot

13 Luxembourg et Jourdan

14 Villeroi

15 Van Damme

16 Fontenoy

17 De Gaulle

18 Avoué du Saint-Sépulchre

19 Wolfsschlucht

20 Battle of the Bulge

 

The New Adventures of Marbot - Clifton Seeney, (Italian Corps), French

Chapter 1 part 1

By Cliff Seeney

Les Soeurs Volantes de l'Artillerie à Chval

Kliff Sini

Chapter I: Les Soeurs Volantes de l'Artillerie à Cheval

THE CAMP

I begin this narrative of my adventures in 1804, when Napoleon was about to be crowned Empereur des Français , Emperor of all the French. It was then that I first reported to the camp of the IIème Corps d'Armée, at Montreuil in Northwestern France . There were many such camps along the coast of the Pas-de-Calais, housing the finest army that France had ever assembled: l'Armée d'Angleterre , the “Army of England.” An ambitious notion our prospective Emperor had, this invasion and conquest of perfidious Albion . As a man with some experience at sea, I knew that the Royal Navy truly “rules the waves” (as the Rosbifs are so fond of singing); train as we might, we would have difficulty ever transporting this “Army of England” to England ! But, for all of that, I was proud to be part of it.

After some years in the Cavalry, I was transferred to the II Corps at my own request, thanks to the help of an ami (friend) of mind in the Ministry of War. I have cultivated many friendships in my time; you would be surprised at how often the unlikeliest fellow can do you a good turn.

As I entered the II Corps camp, I was greeted by a lieutenant colonel of the V Division; a plain, honest veteran who seemed to me to be a republican of the old order. He directed me to the VI Division bivouac. There I reported to the Officer of the Day. He showed me to the Artillery Park and to the company that was to be mine. Even at the first glance, I noticed some things about the condition of the guns and equipment; I began to compile a mental inventory of the work ahead of me. My ambition was straightforward: first, to remedy any deficiencies in the company; then, to improve my company, both equipment and personnel, until we were truly a compagnie d'élite , a crack unit, efficient and deadly, an example for the entire Army.

Some Background Facts:

For many years, the drivers responsible for the movement of guns and ammunition were civilian contractors, not noted for either efficiency or courage. They had been known, all too often, to cut and run in the midst of battle, leaving the guns to be captured by the enemy. Napoleon fixed this upon becoming First Consul in 1800.

Train d'Artillerie

The Artillery train was militarized, becoming the excellent Train d'Artillerie , with its own distinctive uniform, organized into battalions.

The companies of the Train d'Artillerie were parceled out in wartime; matching up to Artillery companies. Through long service together, these drivers and gunners became crack, battle-tested units. He also gave trumpeters to the foot-artillery companies. The battery commanders undoubtedly found this to be very helpful, especially as their drummers might not always be available as they were on foot like the gunners. Horse teams were harnessed two abreast and then hitched in tandem. The train drivers rode the left-hand horse of each pair, controlling both paired horses. It was difficult work; definitely not for lightweights. Four horses per gun, so we would have twenty-four horses to pull our six guns. Artillery Company consisted of élite gunners, about eight men per gun; on the average the gunners were bigger and more muscular than their infantry and cavalry comrades. Serving the guns was grueling, hard work, not just in combat, but before and after. Just cleaning the guns, following hours of firing, was a major task, as was maintaining the tubes, carriages and vehicles. The vehicles and carriages might appear strong and sturdy, but prolonged firing and travel over execrable roads could quite literally shake the vehicles apart. Being a gunner also meant long hours at crew drill. Our guns were lights, 4-pounders, then considered to the standard for a Horse-Artillery Company. The loss of a gun was considered as serious a breach of honor as losing an Eagle (military standard).

A horse artillery company consisted of six crews, each of eight men, so I would have a minimum of 48 gunners in the company, with about as many more ouvriers (laborers) and other specialists. Each crew was commanded by a Brigadier (corporal), and each section, which was three guns, was commanded by a Sous-Lieutenant (2 nd Lieutenant), assisted by a Sergent . The company was led by a Capitaine (myself), assisted by my Lieutenant .

As I have said, I had worked the sea; one thing I had learned was that seamen were often far better gunners than landsmen. A number of matelots (sailors) that I had served with before were in the nearby port of Le Touquet, most of them were experienced gunners, and I knew that they were in need of work. I felt that I could make good use of them here. So, I did some recruiting in the port. I got twelve sturdy matelots to enlist with me, all good, reliable lads; I knew them from the old days on the Italian coast in 1800. It was almost too easy; they were desperate for employment, as the English had our ports in total blockade. I offered them a chance to serve rather than starve, to go and share in the bounty that the Empire was about to reap ashore, rather than risk rotting in the local jail if they were caught smuggling. There was one among them that I didn't know personally; his name was Victor, a Polish chap – I could never pronounce his family name to save my life, it was something like Prznblglwsk – a young fellow of good height and frame, who later was to become an aide to Prince Murat.

As we were leaving the docks I noticed a group of African laborers – about twenty of them. Many of the French seaports have long been the places were east meets west and north meet south. It amazes me that so many people have no knowledge of the many Africans in this country, or know of their service in our Army and Navy! As a former seaman I know that there is a bigger world outside of France , and many kinds of people. Because of the British blockade, many of these newcomers had fallen into dire straits. Many were unable to find work or buy food, and unable to return to their own countries.

As I approached them, I noticed that one of these lads (a rather large fellow) was treated by the others with deference. I asked him if he was the crew leader, and if they needed employment. (Since there is no slavery here in France , I knew that they were “freemen”.) They answered enthusiastically, “ Dire répondre oui! ” Yes! For they were in no better state than the seaman; you see, not all is well in France .

From my years at sea, and having also worked as an engineer, I knew that men such as these could be excellent workers, strong and tireless, with a natural talent for building and repairing. As I conversed with them, I found that many of them even had military experience, having served with General Kléber's 21e Légère in Egypt ; all of them were from Northeast Africa . As a group, we called them our “Nubians.”

One of them, a fellow known as La Montagne, was to become legendary for his great strength, not unlike General Alexandre “Davy” Dumas (the son of a French nobleman and an African slave, father and grandfather of literary giants). We enlisted one of the seamen and some of the Africans as our band. They were to do double duty: gunners first, then musicians. The most valuable man in the whole company was our Nubian trumpeter, Jami; he had to learn all the calls and play loudly enough to be heard over the guns, and had to learn to ride a Dragoon mount. Jami was about 5'11'' or maybe a little under 6 feet, but being very thin he could rise up in the saddle to make his calls. We gave him a red Dragoon trumpeter's uniform and the regulation Artillerie à Cheval shako with white cords. Jami was a fine fellow, as proud of his accomplishments as the Chevalier de Saint-Georges, another Franco-African musician-soldier who had died in 1799.

Another one of the Nubians was also a good trumpeter, by the name of Michel; without him, we would not be here to tell this tale. I now had thirty-two new men to add to my existing company of fifty-four. The group was now eighty-six in number. They would follow me not only because they were ordered, but because of the personal bonds of trust and respect that gradually grew between us, and for love of France .

Cantinière

Later that same month I was lucky enough to make the acquaintance a charming demoiselle by the name of Mélissande; she was working as a Cantinière then at the Division headquarters. I took a fancy to this sweet young person; she would prove to be my life-saver in the future. She and her friends came willingly to work for our company. They, the Cantinières, were to be a great comfort to the men. Any extra food and wine that they received in barter for their laundry service to the Corps was shared. One for all and all for one!

I was also looking for a skilled chasseur to train my men in light infantry combat. Although the Nubians had served in the 21e Légère, they were not thoroughly trained. You see there are the trained and the untrained; I prefer the trained! So I called on my acquaintance, the old republican lieutenant-colonel in the 5 th Division, to see if he could help me. He said that he had a good Brigadier that I could have, and he gave me him to train these men. He was from the 9e Légère (light infantry), a fellow by the name of Charles Salle.

Next, there was need in the camp to acquire a good cook. So with the aid of ma mie (my lover) Mélissande and my new Brigadier , I began to ask around where we might find such a one. We were told that there was a former Royal Chef de Cuisine of great talent being held in the local prison. His gastronomic masterpieces were now, hélas , being wasted in fattening the chief of Police in Montreuil ; this well-fed gendarme was an unworthy person by all accounts, corrupt and venal, demanding payoffs from the citizens to keep their names out his books. The people paid, for no-one dared to offend this miserable disciple of Fouché.

This incarcerated and exploited artist of the cook-pot was just the man we needed. I had to come up with a good plan to get this fellow into our service. I discussed this challenge with René, the cleverest of my seamen. bRené has been in any number of scrapes in his life, and from these has gained much familiarity with the inside of prisons – a real con man, René, if there ever was one – and a joker, as well! His plan was to get himself arrested and placed in that prison. Once he was there, he would get to know this cook; René has a way about him, such that people just seem to love being around him, and he can talk anybody into anything. René would fill the cook's head with tales of the fine fellowship and excellent treatment a man gets in our Company, until the cook wanted nothing in the world but to become one of us. Of course, there would then be the small matter of extracting René and the cook from their stony cage. A challenge, indeed! I decided that the best way was to have some of the ex-royals in the Company help us; what better way to get the different personalities together and build esprit de corps than a good Adventure!

THE PRISON BREAK

Monsieur René was duly thrown in jail for trying to sell counterfeit jewelry to a local woman, who also happened to be the paramour of the chief gendarme . René worked his charm on the cook, and soon passed us a message that all was ready on the inside. As our next step, one of our most ravishing Cantinières, Mademoiselle Anne, took to visiting the prison, flirting with the guards, under the guise of a laundress. She soon had the run of the place, and was able to signal René that the break was for that night.

The first element of our strategy was Anne; with this delightful person visiting the salle de garde , teasing and flirting her best, the guards would be much inclined to neglect their boring duties of watch and ward. Meanwhile, we were going to blow open the front gate of the prison with one of our cannon. I had a number of the ex-royalists dress up in their old uniforms; this band of supposed émigrés loomed suddenly out of the darkness, nearly frightening the goggle-eyed sentry out of his wits, and shouted: “ Open in the name of the King! We come to free the Duc du Touquet! ” (The Duc was the only prisoner of note held at the Montreuil Prison). I was with a group of the Africans, leading them over the back wall of that Prison, while this spectacular distraction riveted the attention of the guards at the front. We found our way to the place where I had arranged to meet with the Cantinière Anne, who then led us to the cell shared by the cook and René. The Africans rendered the turnkey unconscious, and we soon had our men free! Returning back over the wall with them all, we made our escape at the same time as the gunners were blowing open the gate with the cannon, sending the terrified guards scurrying for cover.

The tocsin was sounding, and the village was in an uproar; we knew that we didn't have long before reinforcements of mounted gendarmes and the National Guard would be on us. We made a quick escape though the nearby woods to a prearranged place, where we changed into our regular uniforms, then headed back for the town, to appear like we were there to help. Once we reached the Prison, the chief gendarme asked me, “What is a large detail of mounted Artillerymen doing this far from the camp?” I solemnly explained to the policier that we were out on night maneuvers, and showed him an order from my commanding officer for us to do it in this area. The prison guards, now freed from their earlier terror, were puffing out their chests and claiming they had beaten off an attack by a whole battalion , no, a regiment of the émigré army, with a battery of enormous siege-guns, and prevented the royalist devils from freeing the Duc du Touquet; surely they should all receive medals and commendations?

We now had our cook; he was to prove that he had well deserved his prestigious former employment in the Royal kitchens. (One can tell, looking at the portraits of Louis XVI, that our late monarch had appreciated good food.) One of the best cooks around! Perhaps you are wondering why we went to so much trouble just to get a cook? You see, the second most important thing in an Army, after ammunition, is the science of cooking!

More Next Newsletter

 

 

Interview with Peter Hofschröer - From NWC Prussian Army (On Loan from Scott Ludwig, Prussian Webmaster at NWC)

Welcome to the first installment of Grapeshot where we fire a bunch of questions at our guest and see what turns up. Our first unfortunate target is Mr. Peter Hofschröer, a man well known in wargaming and Napoleonic history circles. He is renowned for his in-depth study of the Prussian/German side of events during the wars against Imperial France and for his cutting edge analysis of these times. Mr. Hofschröer dares to be different.

Mr. Hofschröer's published works include a two volume account of the Waterloo Campaign (the second of which was released in October, 1999); volumes in the Osprey Men-at-Arms series on the Prussian and Hanoverian Napoleonic Armies; an analysis of the Leipzig-1813 battle for the Osprey Campaign series, as well as numerous articles in various academic and hobby magazines.

Welcome sir, we'll start with a little background on yourself.

I was born on the 28th of May, 1956 in London, England. I attended King's College, University of London, where I received a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in German and History. King's had, at that time, Britain's leading War Studies Department. I currently reside in Rottenmann, Austria.

When did you first become interested in military history?

Ever since I can remember, I always have been.

Do you have interests in other eras of military history besides the Napoleonic one?

Frederick and Bismarck.

Which is your favourite and why?

Bismarck. The combination of modern weapons with the colourful uniforms of earlier periods is an interesting combination.

Do you frequent any historical discussion groups on the Internet?

Several, particularly the Napoleon Series.

I understand you helped in the design of a wargame for the computer, could you tell us a bit about that?

I didn't design the game. I merely provided historical information for MicroProse's "Fields of Glory". In its time, it was a revolutionary product.

Are you currently involved in any similar projects? If not, would you like another opportunity to provide historical assistance for another computer game?

No. I would happily provide historical assistance for another computer game.

Do you wargame yourself? If so, could you tell us about the extent of your interests here?

I stopped years ago. You can see my wargames army on display in the Blücher Museum in Kaub on the Rhine.

What surprises you most about wargamers in general?

I have not been in touch with the wargaming community for so long that I cannot comment.

(Interviewer's Note: I asked Mr. Hofschröer several questions on wargaming, but since he was no longer in those circles, he felt he could not adequately answer them. I have omitted them to avoid repetition and to save space. Mr. Hofschröer if you are curious about computer wargaming, drop me a note!)

You have often stated to the effect that Anglo-historians perpetuate myths about the Waterloo campaign by re-hashing second and third party sources that don't quite have the whole picture. Name three of the foremost English language authorities on this subject.

William Siborne was the one and only British historian ever to conduct original research into the Waterloo Campaign and his writings were based in part on primary sources. Chesney's analysis of the Campaign was remarkable in its attempt at objectivity. I cannot think of any other British works on the subject that meet those two criteria - solid research and objectivity.

How about non-anglophone authors? (ex. German/ French/ Dutch/ Belgian/ Russian)

Pflugk-Harttung exhausted the German archives. Charras wrote the first authoritative French account of the campaign, although it was published in Belgium. He did not make himself popular at home, as Waterloo remained a sensitive subject in France for decades afterwards. De Bas and T'Serclaes de Wommersom based their work largely on the Netherlands archives. I know of no Russian work on the campaign.

What would be the best, if any, German sources translated into English that are available to would-be scholars of the Napoleonic period?

Some of Clausewitz's work, although that suffered from having been published posthumously. Had the famous solider-philosopher himself read the manuscripts, I am sure he would have made some alterations. Müffling's memoirs, though these are unreliable in places. His memory was rather selective when it came to his own errors. The best works - the general staff histories of these campaigns - have never been translated. That is a shame because these works are of the highest standards.

You have done so much archival research from sources that, until recently, were largely ignored or overlooked. Do you feel there may yet be a wealth of data that remains untapped, say in archives of former East-bloc nations?

Ironically, one of the main untapped sources of archive material on the subject is that in Britain. Thanks to the Royal Commission for Historical Manuscripts and the National Register of Archives, it is possible for the historian to locate all known papers via the internet. There is a substantial amount of unused material that British Waterloo historians have never used and it is so easy to locate. Instead, we just get a regurgitation of selected myths, often with new embellishments. This contrasts with the Prussian War Archives, which are missing, presumed destroyed in World War 2. Thanks to their extensive use and direct quotation in works such as those by Pflugk-Harttung and others, it has been possible for me to reconstruct a substantial part of this missing material. Incidentally, rumour has it that the larger part of the Prussian War Archives survived 1945 and is currently held in the former KGB archive in Moscow, but nobody is admitting this yet.

In your recently published books you lay out the evidence that the Duke of Wellington actively deceived Blücher and the Prussians. At what point in your studies did you formulate this theory, that is, what inspired you to look deeper into this question?

I was aware that a number of German historians had made this accusation a century ago. When I began my researches, I considered their charges to be flavoured by the politics of that period. However, on checking the papers of Sir Hudson Lowe, for a time Wellington's quartermaster-general (chief-of-staff) in 1815, by coincidence, I found several documents that indicated he was not convinced by the version of certain events as given by Wellington. Pursuing that line of research added several years of work to this project and took me to archives and private homes, particularly in Britain. Here, I found a number of significant items that corroborated the charges made a century ago. The accusations made then by those German historians, as it turns out, were fairly mild. The full extent of Wellington's attempts at manipulating the record to cover his own errors has yet to be told. My books mention only one or two instances.

So, Wellington, in your assertions, is more guilty of what he didn't tell Blucher then in what he had already promised?

To an extent, yes. However, let us not forget that Wellington deliberately misled Blücher, Müffling and the Prince of Orange as to his intentions on the morning of 16 June 1815. For instance, several times Wellington claimed he was moving a substantial part of his army to Quatre Bras. The fact of the matter is that, other than part of the Reserve, he issued no orders for any further troops to move to that point until after the fighting had started. In fact, had the Prince of Orange not been so alert and ordered up certain divisions himself while Wellington was away at the meeting at Brye with Blücher, then the chances are that Ney would have overwhelmed Quatre Bras very quickly.

Were there any major surprises that arose as you gathered materials for this project?

The biggest surprise was locating the manuscript of a translation into English of Clausewitz's History of the 1815 Campaign. I was aware that the Earl of Ellesmere, a close associate of Wellington, had translated Clausewitz's 1812, and I always wondered why he did not translate the 1815 volume as well. When checking some other papers in the unpublished Wellington Papers, I found the manuscript of the translation of Clausewitz's 1815. Wellington disapproved of parts of Clausewitz's writings - he was particularly sensitive about the issue of his broken promises of support made to Blücher. He made his disapproval known to his associates and they discretely dropped the issue. The manuscript was never published and Wellington, in effect, ensured that it did not see the light of day.

Do you think Clausewitz's 1815 will ever be published in English?

Clausewitz's 1815 will be published in English in the next couple of years. Dr. Gregory Pedlow, SHAPE's official historian based in Mons, Belgium, near Waterloo, is working on the translation and Dr. Christopher Bassford, a Clausewitz specialist, is editing the text. I have assisted this project by supplying part of the correspondence on this issue between Wellington and certain of his associates from my files.

Is it your assertion that Wellington willingly wanted the French blows to fall first upon the Prussians or was his supposed deception a cover up for his misjudgments?

The balance of the evidence indicates that Wellington did not deliberately intend leaving Blücher in the lurch. However, for reasons we can only largely speculate at today, Wellington did not react to the news of the outbreak of hostilities on 15 June 1815 as quickly as he should have done. Wellington misled Blücher as to his positions and intentions to buy back the lost time. When he started to mislead Blücher, putting him in danger off facing a substantial part of Napoleon's forces with little or no support from Wellington, he did so in the knowledge that Blücher had ordered all four of his army corps to concentrate in the Sombreffe position. It was only the next afternoon at the meeting at Brye near Ligny that Wellington heard Bülow would not be arriving. The battle was just about to start and by then it was too late for Wellington to go back on what he had said.

Obviously you have been subjected to vehement attacks from Wellington supporters. What is your biggest argument with them, that is, what vital bit of information do you suppose they are ignoring that would invalidate their claims?

Wellington's supporters have been conducting a smear campaign against my person and my writings. They have not been able to refute a single point of my case. Instead they have deliberately misrepresented it. I find it ironic that those attempting to defend their great hero against charges of duplicity and deceit do so by being duplicitous and deceitful themselves. Sadly, they are the last people to realize that they have done more to undermine the reputation of their great hero than anything I have ever written. They have deliberately ignored the entire body of significant documentary evidence I have produced. I suspect this is because this evidence is so overwhelming that a plausible counter-argument is not possible. Instead, we have had a display of hysterics.

You have quoted yourself as "having an axe to grind" like other author-historians that write along national lines. Is it possible that your arguments are slightly biased, thereby bringing a sort of patriotic balance to the whole picture?

I am the first to say that my work is not balanced. I have never claimed it is. I am telling the other side of the story and hoping that my one tome will go some way to correcting the false impressions made by British writers over the best part of two hundred years.

What is your feel for the German people's appreciation of their 18th and 19th century heritage?

Germans today are taught that they only have twelve years of history, that they must be ashamed about it and that every person coming along with a story - even those that are implausible - about how their family suffered in that time, must be given sympathy and preferably money. The rest of German history is largely ignored. There are a number of cases of good historians that have been persecuted for not toeing the line and being politically correct.

What is your next topic going to be? Do you have any more Napoleonic topics that would like to research?

I am currently working on an Osprey Campaign on Lützen/1813. The project I am currently planning has the working title "Waterloogate - How Wellington Manipulated the Record". You think my work on the subject to date has been controversial? I have saved the best parts for last!

(Interviewer's note: Ouch! Can't wait for that one!)

Thank you Mr. Hofschröer for your time and patience. Perhaps we can visit with you again when your next works are published?

 

 

Battle of Rivoli - Scott Ludwig, CiC, French



Rivoli: 01/14/1797

In the Battle of Rivoli (14–15 January 1797) 23,000 French under General Bonaparte defeated an attack of 28,000 Austrians under General Alvinczy. This key victory in the first French campaign in Italy against Austria. It was Austria's fourth and final attempt to relieve their besieged fortress of Mantua. Rivoli demonstrated Napoleon's brilliance in his first campaign, established his genius for war, and led to French occupation of northern Italy.

Prelude

Alvinczy's plan was to overwhelm Joubert in the mountains east of Lake Garda with the concentration of five separate columns, and thereby gain access to the open country north of Mantua where Austrian superior numbers would be able to defeat Bonaparte's smaller Army of Italy. However, Joubert held, and Bonaparte was able to bring up elements of Massena's division to support Joubert's efforts to form a defensive line on favorable ground just north of Rivoli on the Trambasore Heights. The battle would be a contest between Alvinczy's efforts to concentrate his dispersed columns versus the arrival of French reinforcements.

The battle

The morning of the 14th saw fierce fighting along the Trambasore Heights, as another Austrian column attempted to turn the French right via the Rivoli Gorge. By 11:00 things looked very bad for Bonaparte: Austrian dragoons had forced their way through the gorge, word arrived that another Austrian column was cutting off his retreat south of Rivoli, and Alvinczy himself was on the Trambasore Heights urging his victorious battalions forward, though they were unformed due to combat and rough terrain.

Meanwhile a series of events managed to take advantage of this crucial mistake. Bonaparte, Joubert, and Louis Alexandre Berthier put together a well co-ordinated combined arms attack. A battery of 15 guns blasted the dragoons, while two columns of infantry, one for the gorge and one for the Trambasore Heights were led forward supported by cavalry under Charles Leclerc and Antoine Charles Louis Lasalle. It was too much for the packed masses in the gorge when suddely their own dragoons were running them over in panic. And likewise the dispersed infantry on the Heights were unable to hold once French cavalry got in their midst. Lastly, General Louis Rey's division arrived just in time to force the southern Austrian column to retreat. The next day Joubert led a successful pursuit of Alvinczy, all but destroying his columns, the remnants of which fled over the Alps in confusion.

Aftermath

The Battle of Rivoli was Bonaparte's greatest victory at the time, losing a mere 5,000 men to Alvinczy's 14,000.

The Rue de Rivoli, a street in central Paris, is named after the battle.

References

Boycott-Brown, Martin. The Road to Rivoli. Cassell; New Ed edition, 2002. ISBN 0-304-36209-3

 

Best of the Forum:

Forum Links: http://nwcg.proboards23.com/index.cgi

Below are links to some of the best and humorous discussions on the forum:

Fish and Chips - Colin and Fowler with Tom

Poles vs Austria - Some Historic Discussion - Various Members

Tom asks why Prussians are so Stinky - Tom and Company

Best French Cavalry - Various Members

Tom Returns and Tells Horse Riding Story

 

More to Come Next Time!! Trial of Catseye!!

 

Editor Notes:

We are always looking for submissions. Send them to Scott Ludwig I am trying new ideas for the Newsletter, so feel free to send comments or suggestions. I will try to find good stuff from the forum to maybe get folks over there, as we normally have good conversations in it.

 

This website designed and maintained by INWC Stats Team

© 2002-present / International Napoleonic Wargaming Club (INWC)